网络嵌入性、国际学习如何影响企业国际化速度

熊焰; 徐佳媛; 秦剑

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2096-3424.2024.01.009

网络嵌入性、国际学习如何影响企业国际化速度

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3424.2024.01.009

上海应用技术大学经济与管理学院, 上海 201418

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目（71974130）资助

详细信息

作者简介:
熊焰：熊　焰（1974-），男，教授，博士，主要研究方向为技术创新和知识产权管理。E-mail：xiongyan@sit.edu.cn

通讯作者:
秦　剑（1981-），男，副教授，博士，主要研究方向为创新管理与AI营销。E-mail：qinjian@sit.edu.cn

中图分类号: F272.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 51
- HTML全文浏览量: 20
- PDF下载量: 8
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-05-29
- 网络出版日期: 2024-01-26
- 刊出日期: 2024-03-30

The effects of network embeddedness and international learning on the speed of enterprise internationalization

School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201408，China

摘要

摘要: 新兴经济体企业在全球化中呈现出快速国际化现象，良好的网络嵌入有助于企业国际要素流动和优化资源配置。基于2000—2019年中国制造业上市公司的面板数据，研究了网络嵌入性对企业国际化速度的影响，并分析了国际学习的过程机制及东道国制度水平的边界影响。研究结果表明，网络嵌入性不仅直接提高了基于广度和基于深度的企业国际化速度，还通过国际学习的中介效应发挥了间接影响。此外，制度发展水平也在网络嵌入性、国际学习和基于广度的国际化速度的关系间发挥了调节效应。扩展了网络嵌入与国际化速度关系的理论文献，也为我国企业提供了有益的国际化经营实践启示。
- 网络嵌入性 /
- 国际学习 /
- 制度水平 /
- 国际化速度
Abstract: Emerging economy enterprises are showing a rapid internationalization phenomenon in globalization, and good network embeddedness promotes international factor mobility and optimal resource allocation of enterprises. Based on panel data of Chinese manufacturing listed companies from 2000 to 2019, the impact of network embeddedness on the internationalization speed of enterprises was investigated and the process mechanism of international learning and the boundary effect of host country institutional level was analyzed. The findings showed that network embeddedness not only directly increased the internationalization speed of enterprises based on breadth and depth, but also exerted an indirect effect through the mediating effect of international learning. In addition, the level of institutional development also played a moderating role in the relationship between network embeddedness, international learning, and breadth-based internationalization speed. The article not only enriches the theoretical literature on the relationship between network embeddedness and speed of internationalization, but also provides useful insights into the practice of international business for Chinese enterprises.
- network embeddedness /
- international learning /
- institutional level /
- internationalization speed of enterprises

HTML全文

图 1 研究模型

Figure 1. Research model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 主要变量符号和含义

Table 1. Main variable symbols and meanings

变量名称	符号	含义
基于广度的国际化速度	Speed_bre	海外子公司数量与总的子公司数量的比值
基于深度的国际化速度	Speed_de	海外业务收入与总销售额的比重
网络嵌入性	NE	企业国际联系相关的国家数量
网络嵌入性	NE	企业国际专业关系占国际关系总数的占比
国际学习	Learning	探索性FDI项目个数
国际学习	Learning	利用性FDI项目个数
东道国制度发展水平	WGI	全球治理指数平均值
企业规模	Size	期末总资产加1后取自然对数
企业年龄	Age	调查年份减去企业上市年份数后加1取自然对数
董事会规模	Board_size	董事会人数加1后取自然对数
全资海外子公司比例	WOSP	全资海外子公司数除以FDI项目总数
独立董事比例	IDP	独立董事人数与董事会总人数的比值
国际化经验	IE	调查年份和首次开展国际化业务年份之差

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 变量描述性统计和相关性分析

Table 2. Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis of variables

变量	均值	标准差	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11
1 speed_bre	0.222	0.174	1
2 speed_de	0.281	0.262	0.287***	1
3 NE	2.342	1.734	0.485***	0.133***	1
4 Learning	2.207	1.519	0.031**	0.102***	0.213***	1
5 WGI	48.70	0.662	0.0210	0.033**	-0.043***	-0.032**	1
6 age	2.644	0.362	-0.167***	-0.138***	0.122***	0.173***	-0.236***	1
7 size	24.95	4.908	-0.066***	-0.048***	0.078***	0.071***	0.035***	0.223***	1
8 Board size	2.503	0.234	-0.109***	-0.064***	0.0140	0.022*	-0.023*	0.176***	0.079***	1
9 WOSP	2.117	2.749	0.457***	0.064***	0.641***	-0.194***	-0.037***	0.033***	0.049***	0.020	1
10 IDP	0.369	0.0752	0.035***	-0.030**	0.023*	0.055***	0	-0.044***	0.006	-0.17***	0.029**	1
11 experiences	13.83	4.307	-0.135***	-0.087***	0.097***	0.215***	-0.245***	0.804***	0.196***	0.169***	-0.023*	-0.03***	1

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 基准回归结果

Table 3. Baseline regression results

	国际化广度速度	国际化深度速度
	模型（1）	模型（2）
NE	0.036^***	0.027^***
	(0.001)	(0.003)
age	–0.100^***	–0.144^***
	(0.009)	(0.016)
size	–0.003^***	–0.001^*
	(0.000)	(0.001)
Board_size	–0.061^***	–0.054^***
	(0.008)	(0.015)
WOSP	0.015^***	–0.004^**
	(0.001)	(0.002)
IDP	–0.007	–0.165^***
	(0.025)	(0.045)
experience	0.002^***	0.004^***
	(0.001)	(0.001)
_cons	0.606^***	0.862^***
	(0.053)	(0.096)
N	5973.000	5973.000
R²	0.330	0.051
控制年份	Yes	Yes
注：小括号内为稳健标准误差，、、** 表示显著

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 中介效应回归结果

Table 4. Intermediation effect regression results

	国际学习	国际化广度速度		国际化深度速度
	模型（1）	模型（2）	模型（3）	模型（4）	模型（5）
NE	0.475***	0.036***	0.034***	0.027***	0.018***
	(0.013)	(0.001)	(0.002)	(0.003)	(0.003)
age	–0.017	–0.100***	–0.100***	–0.144***	–0.144***
	(0.082)	(0.009)	(0.009)	(0.016)	(0.016)
size	0.014***	–0.003***	–0.003***	–0.001*	–0.002**
	(0.004)	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.001)	(0.001)
Board_size	0.051	–0.061***	–0.061***	–0.054***	–0.055***
	(0.075)	(0.008)	(0.008)	(0.015)	(0.015)
WOSP	–0.300***	0.015***	0.017***	–0.004**	0.002
	(0.008)	(0.001)	(0.001)	(0.002)	(0.002)
IDP	1.304***	–0.007	–0.014	–0.165***	–0.190***
	(0.229)	(0.025)	(0.025)	(0.045)	(0.045)
experience	0.046***	0.002***	0.002**	0.004***	0.003**
	(0.007)	(0.001)	(0.001)	(0.001)	(0.001)
Learning			0.006***		0.019***
			(0.001)		(0.003)
_cons	–0.921*	0.606***	0.611***	0.862***	0.880***
	(0.490)	(0.053)	(0.053)	(0.096)	(0.095)
N	5973.000	5973.000	5973.000	5973.000	5973.000
R²	0.260	0.330	0.332	0.051	0.060
控制年份	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Sobel检验		4.164***		7.641***
注：小括号内为稳健标准误差，、、**表示显著

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 有调节的中介效应模型回归结果

Table 5. Regression results for the mediated effects model with adjustment

	国际学习	国际化广度速度			国际化深度速度
	模型（1）	模型（2）	模型（3）	模型（4）	模型（5）	模型（6）	模型（7）
NE	0.475***	0.036***	0.034***	0.033***	0.027***	0.018***	0.018***
	(0.013)	(0.001)	(0.002)	(0.002)	(0.003)	(0.003)	(0.003)
WGI	–0.021	0.014	0.014	0.013	–0.002	–0.001	–0.003
	(0.109)	(0.012)	(0.012)	(0.012)	(0.021)	(0.021)	(0.021)
age	–0.017	–0.100***	–0.100***	–0.101***	–0.144***	–0.144***	–0.145***
	(0.082)	(0.009)	(0.009)	(0.009)	(0.016)	(0.016)	(0.016)
size	0.014***	–0.003***	–0.003***	–0.003***	–0.001*	–0.002**	–0.002**
	(0.004)	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.001)	(0.001)	(0.001)
Board_size	0.051	–0.061***	–0.061***	–0.061***	–0.054***	–0.055***	–0.055***
	(0.075)	(0.008)	(0.008)	(0.008)	(0.015)	(0.015)	(0.015)
WOSP	–0.300***	0.015***	0.017***	0.017***	–0.004**	0.002	0.002
	(0.008)	(0.001)	(0.001)	(0.001)	(0.002)	(0.002)	(0.002)
IDP	1.304***	–0.007	–0.014	–0.016	–0.165***	–0.190***	–0.192***
	(0.229)	(0.025)	(0.025)	(0.025)	(0.045)	(0.045)	(0.045)
experience	0.046***	0.002***	0.002**	0.002**	0.004***	0.003**	0.003**
	(0.007)	(0.001)	(0.001)	(0.001)	(0.001)	(0.001)	(0.001)
Learning			0.006***	0.006***		0.019***	0.019***
			(0.001)	(0.001)		(0.003)	(0.003)
Learning×WGI				0.003*			0.005
				(0.002)			(0.003)
_cons	–0.996***	0.656***	0.662***	0.664***	0.855***	0.874***	0.878***
	(0.264)	(0.029)	(0.029)	(0.029)	(0.052)	(0.051)	(0.051)
N	5973.000	5973.000	5973.000	5973.000	5973.000	5973.000	5973.000
R²	0.260	0.330	0.332	0.332	0.051	0.060	0.060
控制年份	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
注：小括号内为稳健标准误差，、、**表示显著

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 基准回归稳健性检验结果

Table 6. Baseline regression robustness test results

	国际化广度速度	国际化深度速度
	模型（1）	模型（2）
NE	0.036***	0.027***
	(0.000)	(0.005)
age	–0.100***	–0.144***
	(0.006)	(0.021)
size	–0.003***	–0.001
	(0.001)	(0.001)
Board_size	–0.061***	–0.054***
	(0.006)	(0.007)
WOSP	0.015***	–0.004***
	(0.001)	(0.001)
IDP	–0.007	–0.165***
	(0.018)	(0.038)
experience	0.002***	0.004*
	(0.001)	(0.002)
_cons	0.606***	0.862***
	(0.018)	(0.053)
N	5973.000	5973.000
R²	0.330	0.051
控制年份	Yes	Yes
注：小括号内为稳健标准误差，、、**表示显著

下载: 导出CSV

表 7 中介效应稳健性检验结果

Table 7. Results of robustness tests for intermediation effects

	国际学习	国际化广度速度		国际化深度速度
	模型（1）	模型（2）	模型（3）	模型（4）	模型（5）
NE	0.136***	0.036***	0.031***	0.027***	0.018***
	(0.003)	(0.001)	(0.002)	(0.003)	(0.003)
age	0.009	–0.100***	–0.100***	–0.144***	–0.145***
	(0.021)	(0.009)	(0.009)	(0.016)	(0.016)
size	0.003***	–0.003***	–0.003***	–0.001*	–0.002**
	(0.001)	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.001)	(0.001)
Board_size	–0.007	–0.061***	–0.060***	–0.054***	–0.054***
	(0.019)	(0.008)	(0.008)	(0.015)	(0.015)
WOSP	–0.084***	0.015***	0.018***	–0.004**	0.002
	(0.002)	(0.001)	(0.001)	(0.002)	(0.002)
IDP	0.211***	–0.007	–0.015	–0.165***	–0.179***
	(0.057)	(0.025)	(0.025)	(0.045)	(0.045)
experience	0.013***	0.002***	0.001*	0.004***	0.003**
	(0.002)	(0.001)	(0.001)	(0.001)	(0.001)
Learning			0.037***		0.067***
			(0.006)		(0.010)
_cons	0.924***	0.606***	0.572***	0.862***	0.801***
	(0.123)	(0.053)	(0.053)	(0.096)	(0.096)
N	5973.000	5973.000	5973.000	5973.000	5973.000
R²	0.309	0.330	0.335	0.051	0.058
控制年份	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
Sobel检验		6.609***		6.84***
注：小括号内为稳健标准误差，、、** 表示显著

下载: 导出CSV

表 8 有调节的中介效应稳健性检验结果

Table 8. Results of robustness tests with moderated mediating effects

	国际学习	国际化广度速度			国际化深度速度
	模型（1）	模型（2）	模型（3）	模型（4）	模型（5）	模型（6）	模型（7）
NE	0.136***	0.036***	0.031***	0.031***	0.027***	0.018***	0.018***
	(0.003)	(0.002)	(0.002)	(0.002)	(0.003)	(0.003)	(0.003)
WGI	–0.007	0.014**	0.014**	0.002	–0.002	–0.001	–0.020
	(0.029)	(0.007)	(0.007)	(0.009)	(0.024)	(0.025)	(0.030)
age	0.009	–0.100***	–0.100***	–0.101***	–0.144***	–0.145***	–0.146***
	(0.022)	(0.013)	(0.013)	(0.013)	(0.016)	(0.016)	(0.016)
size	0.003***	–0.003***	–0.003***	–0.003***	–0.001*	–0.002**	–0.002**
	(0.001)	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.000)	(0.001)	(0.001)	(0.001)
Board_size	–0.007	–0.061***	–0.060***	–0.060***	–0.054***	–0.054***	–0.054***
	(0.020)	(0.009)	(0.009)	(0.009)	(0.014)	(0.014)	(0.014)
WOSP	–0.084***	0.015***	0.018***	0.018***	–0.004**	0.002	0.002
	(0.003)	(0.001)	(0.002)	(0.002)	(0.002)	(0.002)	(0.002)
IDP	0.211***	–0.007	–0.015	–0.016	–0.165***	–0.179***	–0.182***
	(0.060)	(0.024)	(0.024)	(0.024)	(0.047)	(0.047)	(0.047)
experience	0.013***	0.002*	0.001	0.001	0.004***	0.003**	0.003**
	(0.002)	(0.001)	(0.001)	(0.001)	(0.001)	(0.001)	(0.001)
Learning			0.037***	0.037***		0.067***	0.067***
			(0.006)	(0.006)		(0.010)	(0.010)
Learning×WGI				0.010**			0.015
				(0.005)			(0.013)
_cons	0.897***	0.656***	0.623***	0.625***	0.855***	0.796***	0.799***
	(0.073)	(0.029)	(0.030)	(0.030)	(0.051)	(0.051)	(0.051)
N	5973.000	5973.000	5973.000	5973.000	5973.000	5973.000	5973.000
R²	0.309	0.330	0.335	0.335	0.051	0.058	0.058
控制年份	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
注：小括号内为稳健标准误差，、、**表示显著

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(39)

[1]	WANG Y,YAO X,LI K. Imitation and rapid internationalization of emerging market firms[J]. Journal of World Business,2022,57(6): 101364. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101364
[2]	JAIN N K,CELO S,KUMAR V. Internationalization speed,resources and performance:evidence from Indian software industry[J]. Journal of Business Research,2019(95): 26-37.
[3]	李玉刚,纪宇彤. 企业国际市场进入模式、制度距离与合法性危机之间的关系——基于媒体内容分析法[J]. 华东经济管理,2018,32(7): 157-163. doi: 10.19629/j.cnki.34-1014/f.170928006
[4]	JOHANSON J, VAHLNE J E. The uppsala internationalization process model revisited: from liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership ［M］ New York: Routledge Publishing, 2015, 33-95.
[5]	KISS A N,DANIS W M. Country institutional context,social networks,and new venture internationalization speed[J]. European Management Journal,2008,26(6): 388-399. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2008.09.001
[6]	MUSTEEN M,FRANCIS J,DATTA D K. The influence of international networks on internationalization speed and performance:a study of Czech SMEs[J]. Journal of World Business,2010,45(3): 197-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2009.12.003
[7]	HUGHES M,CESINGER B,CHENG C F,et al. A configurational analysis of network and knowledge variables explaining Born Globals' and late internationalizing SMEs' international performance[J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2019,80(1): 172-187.
[8]	YANG M M,LI T,WANG Y. What explains the degree of internationalization of early-stage entrepreneurial firms? A multilevel study on the joint effects of entrepreneurial self-efficacy,opportunity-motivated entrepreneurship,and home-country institutions[J]. Journal of World Business,2020,55(6): 101114. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101114
[9]	HOSKISSON R E,WRIGHT M,FILATOTCHEV I,et al. Emerging multinationals from mid‐range economies:the influence of institutions and factor markets[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2013,50(7): 1295-1321.
[10]	VAHLNE J E,JOHANSON J. The uppsala model on evolution of the multinational business enterprise–from internalization to coordination of networks[J]. International Marketing Review,2013,30(3): 189-210. doi: 10.1108/02651331311321963
[11]	JOHANSON J, VAHLNE J E. The internationalization process of the firm: a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments［M］. New York: Routledge Publishing, 2017:145-154.
[12]	OVIATT B M,MCDOUGALL P. Defining international entrepreneurship and modeling the speed of internationalization[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2005,29(5): 537-553. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00097.x
[13]	AUTIO E,SAPIENZA H J,ALMEIDA J G. Effects of age at entry,knowledge intensity,and imitability on international growth[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2000,43(5): 909-924. doi: 10.2307/1556419
[14]	HILMERSSON M,JOHANSON M,LUNDBERG H,et al. Time,temporality,and internationalization:the relationship among point in time of,time to,and speed of international expansion[J]. Journal of International Marketing,2017,25(1): 22-45. doi: 10.1509/jim.16.0013
[15]	MAC L,EVANGELISTA F. Intensity and diversity of internationalization among small and medium-sized exporters in China[J]. Multinational Business Review,2016,24(3): 229-248. doi: 10.1108/MBR-08-2015-0037
[16]	KANG Y,ZHAO C,BATTISTI M. Organizational learning in SMEs’ internationalization:a moderated mediating effect of absorptive capacity[J]. Long Range Planning,2022,55(4): 102220. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102220
[17]	JIANG G,KOTABE M,ZHANG F,et al. The determinants and performance of early internationalizing firms:a literature review and research agenda[J]. International Business Review,2020,29(4): 101662. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101662
[18]	CASILLAS J C,MORENO-MENÉNDEZ A M. Speed of the internationalization process:the role of diversity and depth in experiential learning[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2014,45(1): 85-101. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2013.29
[19]	HSIEH L,CHILD J,NAROOZ R,et al. A multidimensional perspective of SME internationalization speed:the influence of entrepreneurial characteristics[J]. International Business Review,2019,28(2): 268-283. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.09.004
[20]	YANG K M,TANG J,DONBESUUR F,et al. Institutional support for entrepreneurship and new venture internationalization:evidence from small firms in Ghana[J]. Journal of Business Research,2023,154(1): 113360.
[21]	ZAHOOR N,AL-TABBAA O. Post-entry internationalization speed of SMEs:the role of relational mechanisms and foreign market knowledge[J]. International Business Review,2021,30(1): 101761. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101761
[22]	ODLIN D,BENSON-REA M. Competing on the edge:implications of network position for internationalizing small-and medium-sized enterprises[J]. International Business Review,2017,26(4): 736-748. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.01.003
[23]	BAI W,JOHANSON M,OLIVEIRA L,et al. The role of business and social networks in the effectual internationalization:insights from emerging market SMEs[J]. Journal of Business Research,2021,129(1): 96-109.
[24]	PETROU A P,HADJIELIAS E,THANOS I C,et al. Strategic decision-making processes,international environmental munificence and the accelerated internationalization of SMEs[J]. International Business Review,2020,29(5): 101735. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101735
[25]	KHAN Z,LEW Y K. Post-entry survival of developing economy international new ventures:a dynamic capability perspective[J]. International Business Review,2018,27(1): 149-160. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.06.001
[26]	DAI X Y, SUN Z, LIU H. Disentangling the effects of endogenous export and innovation on the performance of Chinese manufacturing firms[J]. China Economic Review,2018,50(C): 42-58.
[27]	ARAGÒN-CORREA J A,MARCUS A,VOGEL D. The effects of mandatory and voluntary regulatory pressures on firms’ environmental strategies:a review and recommendations for future research[J]. Academy of Management Annals,2020,14(1): 339-365. doi: 10.5465/annals.2018.0014
[28]	KO W W,CHEN Y,CHEN C H S,et al. Proactive environmental strategy,foreign institutional pressures,and internationalization of Chinese SMEs[J]. Journal of World Business,2021,56(6): 101247. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2021.101247
[29]	SADEGHI A,ALIASGHAR O,BOUGUERRA A. Unpacking the relationship between post-entry speed of internationalization and export performance of SMEs:a capability-building perspective[J]. Journal of International Management,2023,29(1): 100982. doi: 10.1016/j.intman.2022.100982
[30]	MATHEWS J A. Dragon multinationals:new players in 21st century globalization[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,2006,23(1): 5-27. doi: 10.1007/s10490-006-6113-0
[31]	LI J,LIU Y,CAO J. Effects of overseas network embeddedness and relationship learning on internationalization performance[J]. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics,2017,20(6-7): 1581-1586. doi: 10.1080/09720502.2017.1386904
[32]	PRASHANTHAM S,FLOYD S W. Routine microprocesses and capability learning in international new ventures[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2012,43(6): 544-562. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2012.13
[33]	陈衍泰,李嘉嘉,范彦成. 中国企业国际化多样性与创新绩效——东道国制度与国有股权的调节效应[J]. 科技进步与对策,2019,36(7): 91-97.
[34]	张夏,汪亚楠. 东道国制度环境、企业异质性与中国对外直接投资[J]. 财贸研究,2020,31(12): 1-18. doi: 10.19337/j.cnki.34-1093/f.2020.12.001
[35]	蔡灵莎. 双元学习,知识整合与对外直接投资绩效研究[J]. 软科学,2020,34(2): 59-65.
[36]	何瑛,于文蕾,杨棉之. CEO复合型职业经历、企业风险承担与企业价值[J]. 中国工业经济,2019(9): 155-173. doi: 10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2019.09.009
[37]	MORAIS F,FERREIRA J. SME internationalisation process:key issues and contributions,existing gaps and the future research agenda[J]. European Management Journal,2020,38(1): 62-77. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2019.08.001
[38]	LI L,QIAN G,QIAN Z. Speed of internationalization:mutual effects of individual and company level antecedents[J]. Global Strategy Journal,2015,5(4): 303-320. doi: 10.1002/gsj.1103
[39]	TAN H,MATHEWS J A. Accelerated internationalization and resource leverage strategizing:the case of Chinese wind turbine manufacturers[J]. Journal of World Business,2015,50(3): 417-427. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2014.05.005

[1]	李艳秋, 朱鲁帅. 基于卷积神经网络的Gray-Scott模型图像分类算法, 应用技术学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3424.2023.04.016
[2]	张俊义, 马莹莹, 黄志仪, 刘莹莹, 刘芳, 陈江梅, 莫米诺, 王磊. 5.5万t/a异丙醇工艺换热网络优化, 应用技术学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3424.2023.01.009
[3]	王广平, 宋金奇, 谭平. 基于工艺变更制度的医药产业数字化转型升级路径分析, 应用技术学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3424.2023.01.011
[4]	邱小燕, 王佳佳. 社交网络中带有真相传播者的谣言传播模型研究　, 应用技术学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3424.2022.04.019
[5]	石云霞. 波长调制型光波导集成MOEMS加速度传感器设计, 应用技术学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3424.2022.02.006
[6]	柳爽, 李宽, 蒋扇英, 许雄. 复杂动态网络间的同步控制与研究, 应用技术学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3424.2022.03.011
[7]	李晓青, 徐军, 魏立群, 付斌, 徐怀君. 铜铝复合轧制结合界面速度场分析, 应用技术学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3424.2022.02.005
[8]	张亚茹, 石华瑀. 不确定技术学习下上海5G基站的采纳与扩散, 应用技术学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3424.2022.02.009
[9]	王小明, 谭跃浪, 蒋珍奇. 我国药品上市许可持有人制度变迁及建议, 应用技术学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3424.2021.068
[10]	罗欢, 曹开田, 钱平, 邓菲. 认知无线网络中频谱预测技术研究进展, 应用技术学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3424.2020.01.012
[11]	廖荣凡, 沈希忠. 基于深度卷积神经网络和局部敏感哈希的图像检索, 应用技术学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3424.2020.02.009
[12]	陈大山. 混合自动驾驶环境下快速路速度引导仿真, 应用技术学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3424.2020.04.009
[13]	漆玉茂, 黄俊革, 卢思同, 张彧, 刘宇. 盐碱环境下混凝土电性参数差异性, 应用技术学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3424.2020.03.012
[14]	廖爱雪, 王哲慧, 孟凡帅, 谢大祥, 左宁, 王磊, 李书珍, 莫米诺. 醋酸乙烯酯装置换热网络优化研究, 应用技术学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3424.2020.04.004
[15]	黄俊革, 刘宇, 王瑞, 卢思同. 基于微服务与机器学习的煤矿安全监测系统, 应用技术学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3424.2020.03.008
[16]	刘红梁. 水平地震作用下建筑结构扭转规则性研究进展, 应用技术学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3424.2020.03.011
[17]	左保川, 王一旭, 张晴. 基于密集连接的层次化显著性物体检测网络, 应用技术学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3424.2020.03.014
[18]	肖琴, 陆钰婷. 基于复杂网络的区域空气污染PM_2.5分析, 应用技术学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3424.2019.01.011
[19]	王晓倩, 侯志芳, 耿兴波, 邱小燕. 纳斯达克半导体行业股指统计特性及其神经网络预测技术研究, 应用技术学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3424.2019.02.013
[20]	张裕, 肖莽. 手机加速度传感器系统误差校正方法研究, 应用技术学报. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3424.2019.04.008